Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Södersjukhuset

Södersjukhuset[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2016 at 13:55:01 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution and quality aerial images with high EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Södersjukhuset, Health care in Sweden
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: ArildV

Support as nominator – ArildV (talk) 13:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --sst✈ 14:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Article is 120 words. Sca (talk) 14:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it a unwritten rule to have more then 120 words? It's not mentioned in the Featured picture criteria. The hospital is undeniably relevant, one of the one of the largest in Scandinavia and takes care of more than 100,000 patients each year (according to the source in the article). There are also Wikipedia articles in six languages.--ArildV (talk) 15:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Unused. A lot of featured pictures are only used in stub articles. This does not disqualify them from being promoted to FP status. It just means that they may not be eligible for appearance on the main page as POTD. sst✈ 15:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you, I understand. I added the images to Healthcare in Sweden (because it is one of the largest hospital in Sweden, I think it is a relevant and adequate illustration).--ArildV (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just on a simple point of accurately depicting the subject, the evening sun makes the buildings look yellow, when they are in fact pure white - Wolftick (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Don't mind the golden hour shot, and though this shot looks messy because of the other buildings included, I can't imagine another way to show the whole hospital. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – While it's not bad as an aerial view of a cityscape, the jumbled and cluttery nature of the subject and its context reduces illustrative value, IMO. (Perhaps it could be cropped a bit?) Sca (talk) 16:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support per Sca in so much as I have no idea what buildings are part of the hospital, other than of course the main stretch in the picture. However it is a nice picture so stil weak support. gazhiley 09:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a problem that which buildings are hospital isn't defined for readers. Sca (talk) 17:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it is a busy picture. Google map [1] and satellite view [2] identify the hospital (basically the bright buildings laid out at 40 degrees). On the left side, the half round/cylindrical building is not part of the hospital nor anything on its left. In the background, the high-rise building and anything behind it and around it is not part of the hospital either. I think a little bit of cropping will be an improvement. Bammesk (talk) 03:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The nomination didn't reach the neccessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]