Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional humor
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 19:28, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 19:28, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Professional humor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unreferenced original research tagged so for well over a year with no slightest attmempts to improve. Judging from some of its utterly ridiculous phrases, the page is not maintained nor even monitored. No prejudice against recreation of a reasonable encyclopedic article according to wikipedia standards. Laudak (talk) 15:41, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Totally unnecessary article. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 16:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article is unsourced and I've not found anything on Google that helps me believe that this topic requires its own article. Bill (talk|contribs) 19:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Below all acceptable standards. Leftfoot69 (talk) 20:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It looks like this was recently vadalised, so it's worse than it used to be but wasn't exactly wonderful then either. I expect most people who type in "Professional humor" are actually looking for something more like our Stand-up comedy article rather than jokes about molecules. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article is funnier than the jokes themselves. Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 01:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per the earlier observations. Though I did like the hydrogen atom joke. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.