Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AnomieBOT 20
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 10:19, 9 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, unsupervised
Programming Language(s): Perl
Function Summary: Remove {{afd-mergefrom}} where the merge has been completed. Report {{afd-mergefrom}} where the AFDed page is a redirect to a different page.
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Periodic
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function Details: Per request, the bot will go through uses of {{afd-mergefrom}} (and redirects) and examine the redirect status of page specified in the first unnamed parameter. If the AFDed page is a redirect to the subject page of the talkpage containing {{afd-mergefrom}}, the template will be removed. If the AFDed page is a redirect to a different page, it will be reported to an appropriate page.
Discussion
[edit]The source is available here. The report page is currently set to User:AnomieBOT/Afd-mergefrom report, but this can be easily changed. The run period is currently set to 6 hours, but this can also be easily changed. I may also add handling of "if the AFDed page has been deleted", which will probably result in removing the template. Anomie⚔ 22:52, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Approved for trial (15 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Seems a very useful task, allowing editors to see which mergers are still pending. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 13:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Trial complete. [1] I stopped the "main" run after 14 edits, so the 15th could be updating the reporting page. Anomie⚔ 02:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Everything looks fine to me:
Approved. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 14:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Everything looks fine to me: