Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 00:30, 10 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2012 at 14:25:04 (UTC)

Original – The Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary in Moscow. A Catholic church (very unusual in Russia) built in a Neo Gothic style.
Alternative – The Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary in Moscow at night..
Reason
Meets criteria
Articles in which this image appears
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin Mary
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
NVO
How about we ignore the criteria and I instead nominate this picture as alternative?♫GoP♫TCN 14:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, add it as an Alt if you really want to. --jjron (talk) 14:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid a retouching doesn't help the resolution. You need more pixels, plain and simple. HereToHelp (talk to me) 19:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And I'm afraid I have to agree... Nikthestoned 20:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One's taken during the day, one's done at night under artificial lighting. :) --jjron (talk) 04:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw I withdraw it. Thanks for everyone who commented. I don't understand your oppose votes concerning the file size; as our featured picture criteria explains, the picture should be minimum 1000 pixel large in either width or height. But you say it is a large object, but the picture small, thus it fails the criteria. ♫GoP♫TCN 11:49, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • As you indicate, the 1000px is a minimum criteria. Most images are expected to be considerably bigger, especially for big things like this or landscapes that inherently contain a lot of detail. And the Alt was considerably below even the minimum. --jjron (talk) 12:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted - withdrawn by nominator. --jjron (talk) 14:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]