Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willie Cochran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:53, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Willie Cochran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In addition to being an unreferenced BLP, it does not meet WP:NPOL or the GNG. There is a small amount of third party coverage (mostly in relation to his election) but in my opinion it is not a "significant amount." --Non-Dropframe _talk 20:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 21:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-dropframe, define "significant". I just did a quick search of the Chicago Tribune and found 53 articles covering the subject, DNA info has 77 articles, NBC Chicago has over 50 articles covering the subject. Also references will be added per BLP. Thanks. Astuishin ^(talk)

@Astuishin:, you're quite right. I dug a bit deeper and realized I'm mistaken. I've withdrawn my nomination.--Non-Dropframe _talk 22:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination based on Astuishin's helpful reply. --Non-Dropframe _talk 22:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.