Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayland Smith in popular culture
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:53, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 07:53, 11 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 05:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wayland Smith in popular culture[edit]
- Wayland Smith in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Trivia collection, often with entries that use only the name. Unacceptable per WP:FIVE and WP:NOT#IINFO. Users worried about the main article should know that I watch it and will keep it clean. Eyrian 18:47, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Casperonline 20:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - directory of loosely associated items combined with original research. "The character Waylon Smithers from the TV show The Simpsons may be named after the mythical figure." OR. "Weyland Smith is mentioned in Neil Gaiman's novel Stardust." Who cares? Get rid of it. Otto4711 21:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and mini-merge Mostly trivia and unsourced.--JForget 01:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This figure is monumentally important as an archetype that has affected literature for the last thousand years. The article may need some work but should not be deleted. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 03:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; no notability asserted nor sourced. Carlossuarez46 20:46, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; the editor was aware that this goes against policy, but does not defend himself here. (Of course a reference inside an article about for instance Waylon Smithers is very interesting.) /Pieter Kuiper 16:32, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.