Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuan Gemuk Athletic FC
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:12, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 12:12, 11 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Flowerparty☀ 00:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tuan Gemuk Athletic FC[edit]
- Tuan Gemuk Athletic FC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fixing incomplete nom by User:Frankie goh with the reason given "Article would have failed the notability criteria, as it is not a professional team nor one playing at the highest non-pro level.Frankie goh (talk) 12:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)". No opinion from me. CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 13:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The nominator appears to be paraphrasing WP:ATHLETE, which is a criterion for individual players, not clubs. That being said, I can't find any substantial independent coverage from Google web or news searches. I can find no mention of either the team or the league it plays in on the Singapore FA site (the two hits for ESPZEN just list the company as an associate member of the FA). The seriousness with which this team takes it football can be seen from its slogan, but I suppose that shouldn't influence our decision. All the evidence I can find points to this being an unnotable park football team. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable club/organisation. Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.