Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharps Barber and Shop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:55, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 12:55, 11 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete both. Majorly (hot!) 00:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sharps Barber and Shop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested speedy. Non-notable, unsourced, promotional. --Finngall talk 01:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Added Kid Glove Shave Gel per discussion, as the two go hand-in-hand. --Finngall talk 13:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Should also include Kid Glove Shave Gel, their flagship product, in this AfD (can't really keep one without the other) ... both are pure vanispamcruftisement ... should probably salt as well, since this is a recreation of a previously deleted article. --68.239.79.97 03:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both it's a brand of men's grooming products, but nothing I see either in Google, [1] Google News, [2] or this article will allow me to rewrite it as a neutral article. Same for Kid Glove Shave Gel too. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-25 12:39Z
- Speedy delete both. Sharps Barber ... has already been deleted twice as spam and the current version is no better. -- RHaworth 22:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete nn.--SlideAndSlip 15:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I do not see a difference between the content of this article and the content of other cosmetics companies'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theshavinggoat (talk • contribs) 18:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.