Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoundCloud rap

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:38, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SoundCloud rap[edit]

SoundCloud rap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the mess caused by recent sockpuppets, this article has no sources that would meet WP:GNG; a WP:BEFORE only shows passing mentions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now and improve. Music magazines and pop music critics have certainly been devoting attention to this sub-genre, even if it is nebulously defined. Music critic Jon Caramanica devoted a feature-length article on SoundCloud rap in The New York Times , noting the sub-genre "in the last year has become the most vital and disruptive new movement in hip-hop thanks to rebellious music, volcanic energy and occasional acts of malevolence".[1] Rolling Stone and Complex have devoted print to the movement,[2][3] while Spin contrasted the sub-genre's popularity with the troubles of SoundCloud the company itself.[4] I've added "find sources: SoundCloud hip hop" above to find additional material. I say develop the article as much as possible and prudent, and if it's no longer a "thing" in a year, I'd have no objection to being merged into a appropriate broader article such as Alternative hip hop or Underground hip hop, to contextualize and consolidate the plethora of micro-genre stubs— as music journalist Mosi Reeves notes: "Before SoundCloud rap was a phenomenon feted by Rolling Stone, the New York Times, Complex, and dozens of lesser trend-hunter publications, there was Tumblr rap, the nickname briefly given to buzzy acts like SpaceGhostPurrp and Antwon; and MySpace rap, which yielded "hipster rappers" like the Cool Kids, Uffie, Pase Rock, and Amanda Blank."[5]

References

  1. ^ Caramanica, Jon (June 22, 2017). "The Rowdy World of Rap's New Underground". The New York Times.
  2. ^ Turner, David (June 1, 2017). "Look At Me!: The Noisy, Blown-Out SoundCloud Revolution Redefining Rap". Rolling Stone.
  3. ^ Holmes, Charles (August 30, 2017). "The Who's Who of SoundCloud rap". Complex.
  4. ^ Sargent, Jordan (July 14, 2017). "Why Soundcloud Rap Couldn't Save Soundcloud". Spin.
  5. ^ Reeves, Mosi. "A Brief History of SoundCloud Rap". The Dowsers: A Magazine About Playlists. Retrieved 8 August 2017.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.