Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge Associates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) clpo13_(talk) 23:00, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge Associates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references are either listings, press releases, or both. The one in the Phoenix, for example, is clearly copied or paraphrased from a company press release. None of these are evidence of notability G news shows some of its own reports,and other notices. DGG ( talk ) 16:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've found a few other things that are not on the page which might need to be considered: this article in Forbes, this one in the FT seems to rate their "US Private Equity index", and this one in Fortune. I think this shows a) that the main financial newspapers note what they produce and b) that they have some profile in those publications. On that basis I suspect that with further investigation, even better secondary sources will turn up. JMWt (talk) 16:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Phoenix does discuss Cambridge's role in the school's finances in some detail.--MainlyTwelve (talk) 04:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The search I've just done for notable references turns up, amongst others, Wall Street Journal [1], Huffington Post [2] and Financial Times [3]. Markpackuk (talk) 22:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 23:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 15:23, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.