Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Perkins
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 19:18, 18 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 19:18, 18 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. NAC. Schuym1 (talk) 22:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Joe Perkins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A non-notable singer. Schuym1 (talk) 14:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Had one appearance in the charts, at #76... that doesn't assert even a shred of notability. Most likely written by a fan. TopGearFreak 15:37, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy/Snow Delete 1 hit at Number 76? Not remotely notable. --Numyht (talk) 16:57, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- At WP:MUSICBIO, requirement #2 says "Has had a charted hit on any national music chart." I think he would pass that, if we can get that verified. So my vote would be Keep if that can be verified,
but if not Delete.
- Followup, I did find him mentioned in a reliable source, found here, which may be enough to meet requirement #1 as well. Tavix (talk) 17:03, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The Billboard website confirms that the song charted, so it meets criteria #2 of WP:MUSIC. Combined with the other sources mentioned, there should be enough for a very short article. BradV 20:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The MUSIC criteria don't say how high a song, single or album should chart, just that it should make the chart, which it did.- Mgm|(talk) 22:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, meets WP:MUSIC#C2. Criteria makes no mention of how high up a chart you need to be, just that it has charted. Billboard reference confirms, notability established. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 04:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.