Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pligg

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 November 6.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Grand master ka 07:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pligg

This article has no external references. Unable to find a single news article or mention of the site in reputable source. Copycat website to original Digg.Mattarata 04:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable website. Article is promotional in nature. Resolute 05:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. As per Resolute. - Mike Beckham 06:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete seems to fail WP:WEB. BJ^Talk 09:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Definitely WP:WEB and WP:ORG.Telly addict^{Editor review!} 14:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete this software is cited in many news site as a concurrent of the original Digg service by the nature of making possible for anyone to easily create a category specific Digg like site, just have a web search! The notion of "copycat website to the original" is ludicrous, because Digg is a service and Pligg a software! Benoit rigaut 02:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.