Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monit
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:28, 21 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 17:28, 21 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:11, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Monit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Software with no assertion of notability. When googling. make sure you add the "-monitor*" string. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 15:32, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- monit is a system monitoring application. Modifying the search in that way does exclude "false positives," but it also excludes positives (even the monit website)--Karnesky (talk) 23:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 00:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete unsourced, and this does not look ready for prime time. Miami33139 (talk) 04:19, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. This doesn't even assert notability let alone hint at non-trivial coverage from a reliable third party. JBsupreme (talk) 07:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Karnesky (talk) 23:23, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per extensive coverage in:
- Adelstein, Tom; Bill Lubanovic (2007-03-01). "Safeguarding a Linux Webserver". Linux system administration. O'Reilly Media, Inc. pp. 97–102. ISBN 9780596009526.
- and other sources. --Karnesky (talk) 23:23, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Numerous sources, actively used software, e.g. Linux magazine and IBM references in 2009. 83.254.210.47 (talk) 17:28, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Delete No non trivial significant coverage, being talked about in some how-to guide is not significant. Triplestop x3 17:14, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. Richard (talk) 04:20, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.