Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrica Rose
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:17, 28 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:17, 28 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Arrica Rose[edit]
- Arrica Rose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Conspicuously non-notable performer. The article offers claims that are not confirmed by a Google search (coverage on something called "International Business Times" is strictly a vanity press release). Fails WP:BIO, WP:RS and WP:V. Ecoleetage (talk) 14:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While there is the possibility of passing WP:MUSIC#C10, all the "reliable independent sources" are a reprint of her own press release, which is not allowed under WP:MUSIC#C1. If any one can find anything else, let me know, I'll be happy to change. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 14:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. Drmies (talk) 18:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP. Not HUGELY noteable, but noteable none the less. Proxy User (talk) 19:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If I may ask, how is Ms. Rose notable? As I read the article -- with its redlinked "2nd release" (and no mention of a first release), insistence of iTunes chart topping (with no evidence to prove it), claims of media coverage (sans the actual links to the coverage) and assertion of having a song sampled on a U.S. TV show (a claim based solely in Ms. Rose's press releases) -- I felt there was no reasonable indication of why Ms. Rose might be notable. The article was originally up for Speedy Delete and its creator blanked the page after the A7 tag was placed, which suggests a bit of "uh oh, the gig is up" (another editor restored the text and the admin who declined the Speedy Delete has acknowledged on my Talk Page that Ms. Rose's notability is dubious, at best). Ecoleetage (talk) 23:02, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- She charted on iTunes and was featured in Paste Magazine, BABY! That's "notable". Proxy User (talk) 17:55, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Baby? Oh, Proxy...I didn't know you cared. :) All seriousness aside, the article has no confirmable references from independent and respected media to confirm those assertions. There are plenty of press releases online from Ms. Rose, but I don't see any links that would meet WP:RS. (Baby?) Ecoleetage (talk) 18:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- She charted on iTunes and was featured in Paste Magazine, BABY! That's "notable". Proxy User (talk) 17:55, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If I may ask, how is Ms. Rose notable? As I read the article -- with its redlinked "2nd release" (and no mention of a first release), insistence of iTunes chart topping (with no evidence to prove it), claims of media coverage (sans the actual links to the coverage) and assertion of having a song sampled on a U.S. TV show (a claim based solely in Ms. Rose's press releases) -- I felt there was no reasonable indication of why Ms. Rose might be notable. The article was originally up for Speedy Delete and its creator blanked the page after the A7 tag was placed, which suggests a bit of "uh oh, the gig is up" (another editor restored the text and the admin who declined the Speedy Delete has acknowledged on my Talk Page that Ms. Rose's notability is dubious, at best). Ecoleetage (talk) 23:02, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete currently fails WP:MUSIC. --Cameron Scott (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.