Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertha (song)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:44, 28 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:44, 28 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Grateful Dead (album). I've not merged anything but the history's there for anyone who wants to. Flowerparty☀ 00:27, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Bertha (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No content, sources, or notability for an article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:49, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 22:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Songs. No awards, no chart, no covers, no WP:RS. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect to Grateful Dead (album). Useful information could be lost if simply deleted. Anyone who is aware of Wikipedia's WP:DAB or WP:MUSTARD#Disambiguation guidelines may use this is a search term. --JD554 (talk) 10:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as per above. Renaissancee (talk) 02:17, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Non-notable song. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 14:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]
- Merge and redirect A University library claims the song was covered by Los Lobos (backed up by Google News). The nominator appears not to have done the required research prior to making the nomination. JD554 explained why the title is acceptable. - Mgm|(talk) 11:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.