Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purplera1n
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:30, 1 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep as per consensus. Non-admin closure for both AfDs. Warrah (talk) 01:17, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Purplera1n (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Hackware with no assertion of notability; only reference is a blog. Also, reads like an instruction manual. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 23:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also nominating:
- Blackra1n (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Keep Purplera1n per [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. Joe Chill (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep both per sources found by Joe Chill, which include CNet, Wired (magazine), Techtree, etc. Pcap ping 08:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep great job Joe Chill. I will make an effort sometime to make the articles more suitable for an encyclopedia. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 23:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep both per the sheer number of high level references. Justin Ormont (talk) 22:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep references are enough and notable enough publications. MrMacMan Talk 05:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Can an admin close this? It's clear that this article will be kept. Girafe53 (talk) 22:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.