Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Na astaraichean
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:54, 1 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anas talk? 23:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Na astaraichean (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
It is a non-notable "religion" founded 1.5 year ago. All the information is obviously self published and a GS gives less than 100 links that most of them are just repeats -- Magioladitis 07:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of media coverage Corpx 07:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 08:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because of no independent sources, and no notability established.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 09:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - orphaned, in poor shape, no independant sources. – sgeureka t•c 11:20, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete bizarre, completely non-noteable, probably one bloke's attempt to pull with the help of wiki.:) Could have been a speedy.Merkinsmum 11:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ATT - unattributable per Google search and possibly WP:SPAM. --Charlene 18:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete patently NN. VanTucky (talk) 21:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom: deleted twice before with different capitalization. PubliusFL 20:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nuke it again. Frjwoolley 21:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.