Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAN, World Artist Network on MySpace
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:08, 10 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 05:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
ATTENTION!
If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether an article is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads (or socks). You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! |
Contested A7 speedy deletion. Message on my talk page includes claim of "This is the largest group on MySpace", which is claim on notability and 199992 sounds like a lot of members, so bringing here for full discussion. Petros471 21:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Forum membership numbers are not the same as references by 3rd party reliable sources. Fails: Wikipedia:Verifiability. If this mini-site was truly notable, then others would have already written about you instead of you ending up having to write a vanity article about yourself. Unique Google hits for ("world Artist Network" MySpace -site:myspace.com) = 47 [1]. Fails: Wikipedia:Notability (web). -- Netsnipe (Talk) 21:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete The member number is massive, but I don't see any evidence of media attention or otherwise having an impact outside of the group itself. I'm also concerned that keeping might lead to more myspace/orkut/yahoo/msn/etc groups wanting articles. Weak delete, possibly change if reliable sources come to the rescue. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: It's 0.2% of MySpace's 100 million accounts membership. And of those 0.2%, who knows how many of them are genuine contributors or people who just want another shiny MySpace equivalent of a Wikipedia:Userbox on their userpage. -- Netsnipe (Talk) 22:08, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Good point. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Netsnipe. --Daniel Olsen 22:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above/nn.--Andeh 22:37, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Netsnipe and Andrew Lenahan. hateless 22:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Netsnipe and other people. Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 23:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Andrew Lenahan -Elmer Clark 00:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Netsnipe and other people. DXRAW 09:56, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.