Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knappily

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train^talk 16:15, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Knappily

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company/app. Lack of significant coverage. - TheMagnificentist 11:06, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- WP:TOOSOON / WP:ARTSPAM and mostly trivia as in: "As on April 26, 2017, the app has over 1 lakh downloads with 4.8 rating[3] on Play Store!" Etc. WP:CORPDEPTH fail and completely unremarkable. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to be valid as defined by WP:GNG, but if this topic goes out of business right now, it doesn't have a history that would sustain an article of enduring interest. Fails WP:SUSTAINED. The statement of what it "intends" to present is of negative value, as it shows there is nothing to say now about the project. Unscintillating (talk) 14:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.