Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty Kelen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 00:32, 16 March 2023 (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (1x)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 00:32, 16 March 2023 by Legobot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (1x))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. (aeropagitica) 12:40, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, page created by User:Striver in November 2005. Does not establish the writers notablity. Unless notablity is established then I vote delete. Jersey Devil 13:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep She fullfils WP:BIO easly, having an audience of over 5000.--Striver 14:11, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep, published by major house, clearly meets applicable criteria for notability. Monicasdude 16:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notable. Please stop nominating every article that Striver makes without checking it first. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 17:50, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - easy keep. --Irishpunktom\talk 17:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep cleanup and expand, though I am not optimistic. I added additional books by this author and ISBNs and deleted the four commercial links. Esquizombi 19:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable writer. 23skidoo 04:27, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per all --Khoikhoi 08:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, as per Monicasdude, the subject of this article is a notable writer who has several books published by a major house, easily meeting the WP:BIO guidelines. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, obviously notable. Article isn't very good, though. ProhibitOnions 12:45, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand: Article needs a lot of expansion. As of now, it is in a bad state. --Ragib 16:27, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.