Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Center of Irvine
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:25, 16 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:25, 16 March 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 23:06, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nn community centre. Does not explain how it is notable (size or history), apart from offering religious counselling and the like.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wasn't notable enough for me to have heard of it when I lived 3 miles away. --Ricaud 03:42, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Turnstep 03:44, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete also as non-notable.--Jersey Devil 05:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn. --Terence Ong 05:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, obviously non-notable. Should have prodded this. Grandmasterka 19:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per above. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 20:44, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 21:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep - Verifiable[1], and notable enough[2][3]. The Imam, Sheikh Sadullah Khan, Speaks on a daily program called "Gems of Prophetic Wisdom" on Islamitv. [4]. Another of its leaders, Abdel Malik has been arrested [5][6]. So yeah, worthy of a keep.--Irishpunktom\talk 00:54, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per above Jcuk 01:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above --Khoikhoi 06:40, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above --Striver 15:33, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.