Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commie robots
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 16:38, 19 March 2023 (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (5x)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:38, 19 March 2023 by Legobot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (5x))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 02:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good work on the page, but unfortunately bands with a single demo that are about to release their debut albums do not meet the standards of WP:MUSIC. Text is a little too promotional as well. Daniel Case 21:04, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because of lack of notability. If notability can be established then I'd change my vote. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 21:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Admitting that they did it with a four track tape recorder makes this all that much worse. GrandmasterkaFile:Blend Flag.jpgImpart wisdom 22:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Just zis Guy you know? 00:14, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 08:50, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hidden category: