Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragnar Grímsson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 01:59, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ragnar Grímsson

Based on what I find, this band doesn't satisfy WP:NMG [1] & [2]. PJM 15:32, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems like a viable article. Kukini 15:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks nn. --Ter e nc e Ong 16:05, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Just shy of nn. --Ricaud 16:43, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this article should definitely share the same fate as their record label. Punkmorten 17:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All of their "records" were "released" in 2005 by their own netlabel, itself headed for deletion as noted by Punkmorten. So just some musicians with a webserver, zero evidence of any impact. Sandstein 18:25, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the last two callers. the.crazy.russian ^{vent here} 18:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, appears to meet minimal standards for notability, though not by all that much. Monicasdude 20:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - they don't meet WP:BAND - they haven't released anything on any of the major record labels or a major indie label, only by their own netlabel (this is as close as the band gets to meeting the notability guidelines). Cursive 23:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.