Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for edits to a protected page". Before listing a request here, please make a request on the protected page's talk page. Click here to return to Requests for page protection. Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here | |
Despite its success in imitating human language, ChatGPT has faced significant criticism for its dangers and ethical concerns.[1][2][3] On March 31, Italian data regulator temporarily banned ChatGPT for leaking user data that contained credit card information and launched an investigation to the security breach.[4]
Please add this text to the lead section of the article. 95.12.127.137 (talk) 18:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- "On March 31" should be "On March 31, 2023," and you want to name the specific regulatory agency rather than a generic "Italian data regulator." —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 20:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- This is already mentioned on ChatGPT#Reception.
And since the talk page isn't protected, this request should go there instead.Edit: talk page is protected, the template was just missing. The RedBurn (ϕ) 08:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)- It is not mentioned in the lead. Per WP:LEAD
All but the shortest articles should start with introductory text (the "lead"), which establishes significance, includes mention of significant criticism or controversies, and make readers want to learn more.
95.12.127.137 (talk) 08:48, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- It is not mentioned in the lead. Per WP:LEAD
References
Remove the claim that "[Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA] is the first video game series to utilize audio created in the Vocaloid software." on the top section of the article.
The top section contains a factual error: regarding Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA, there's a claim that "It is the first video game series to utilize audio created in the Vocaloid software." The first series is actually Katamari Damacy:
The ending song of Korogashi Puzzle Katamari Damacy features the voice of Hatsune Miku, it's even explicitly explained in the article of that Katamari Damacy game.
Korogashi Puzzle Katamari Damacy was released on March 25, 2009; while Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA was released on July 2, 2009.
I do realize it's an extreme nitpick, but still it's something factually wrong on an encyclopedia. I wanted to change the article myself, but it's semi-protected. Santi531 (talk) 07:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)