Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Baca

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:41, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Baca

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject clearly fails WP:GNG, sourcing in article inadequate, WP:BEFORE shows nothing out there. Sent to draft and returned to mainspace, the only loss to Wikipedia in this deletion is saying goodbye to the timeless prose, "Lawrence Baca would get his first camera after he graduated from Harvard and would use that camera to take photos of landscapes all across the United States. One of the pictures he took were in the State of Utah, sites that had huge red figures or sites that had many holes." Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It sounds like this person could be notable if we dig around and find some sources. Also lets try to be mindful that this article was written as part of the Student Program and give this fella some grace. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 09:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Went though and added much better sources, the subject of the article is one of the first Native American civil rights lawyers and appears to be notable. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 10:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:41, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: based on new sources I would say it is notable.Pershkoviski (talk) 22:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to meet WP:GNG (with credit to Dr vulpes). -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY and my own standards for notable lawyers. Specifically, "trying a notable case ... [and] being recognized as an expert in a specialized area of law." Bearian (talk) 19:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.