Jump to content

User:Jonesey95/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jonesey95 (talk | contribs) at 08:21, 23 April 2023 (test). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Finnish Ombudsman for Equality finds that circumcising young boys without a medical reason is legally highly questionable, The Finnish Supreme Court found that non-therapeutic circumcision of boys is assault, and the Finnish Ombudsman for Children proposed that Finland should ban non-therapeutic circumcision of young boys:

The Deputy Ombudsman took the view that circumcising young boys, who are unable to give their consent, without a medical reason is highly questionable from a legal standpoint. … On 31 March 2016, the Supreme Court adopted two decisions that complement a previous precedent in which the Court found that the non-medical circumcision of boys constitutes an assault offence but is not punishable when it is considered to be in the best interests of the child. In 2015, the Finnish Ombudsman for Children Tuomas Kurttila proposed that Finland should enact an act prohibiting the non-medical circumcision of young boys.

— Finland Finnish Ombudsman for Equality[1]

On 30 September 2013, the children's ombudsmen of all five Nordic countriesDenmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden – together with the children's spokesperson from Greenland and representatives of associations of Nordic paediatricians and paediatric surgeons, gathered in Oslo to discuss the issue,[2] and released a joint declaration proposing a ban on non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors:[3]

Let boys decide for themselves whether or not they want to be circumcised

Circumcision without a medical indication on a person unable to provide informed consent conflicts with basic principles of medical ethics, particularly because the operation is irreversible, painful and may cause serious complications. There are no health-related reasons to circumcise young boys in the Nordic countries. Arguments that may argue in favour of circumcision in adult men are of little relevance to children in the Nordic area. Boys can make up their own minds about the operation when they get old enough to provide informed consent.

As ombudsmen for children and experts in children's health we consider circumcision of underage boys without a medical indication to be in conflict with the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child, article 12, about children's right to express their views about their own matters, and article 24, pt. 3, which says that children must be protected against traditional rituals that may be harmful to their health.

In 2013, the UN Human Rights Council has urged all states to end operations that compromise the integrity and dignity of children and are prejudicial to the health of both girls and boys. We consider it central that parental rights in this matter do not have precedence over children's right to bodily integrity. What is in children's best interest must always come first, even if this may limit an adult's right to carry out their religious or traditional rituals.

The Nordic ombudsmen for children and experts in children's health therefore want to work towards a situation, where a circumcision can only be performed, if a boy, who has reached the age and level of maturity required to understand necessary medical information, consents to the operation. We wish a respectful dialogue among all parties involved about how to best ensure boys' self determination with respect to circumcision. We also urge our governments to inform about children's rights and health-related risks and consequences of the operation. We ask the Nordic governments to take the necessary steps towards ensuring that boys get the right to decide for themselves whether or not they want to be circumcised.

— 'Signed by Anne Lindboe, Norwegian ombudswoman for children; Fredrik Malmberg, Swedish ombudsman for children; Maria Kaisa Aula, Finnish ombudswoman for children; Per Larsen, Chairman of the Danish Children's Council; Margrét Maria Sigurdardóttir, Icelandic ombudswoman for children; Anja Chemnitz Larsen, Greenlandic Children's spokesperson, as well as by representatives of Nordic associations of pediatricians and pediatric surgeons.'[4][5]

References

  1. ^ "Circumcision of boys (TAS 143/2016, issued on 23 August 2016) - State…". archive.fo. 2019-10-16. Archived from the original on 2019-10-16. Retrieved 2019-10-16.
  2. ^ "'Circumcision breaches human rights of the child'". The Local Sweden. 28 September 2013. Retrieved 12 October 2022.
  3. ^ Nadja Sayej (4 November 2013). "Is Male Circumcision a Form of Genital Mutilation?". Vice. Retrieved 12 October 2022.
  4. ^ Nordic Association of Children's Ombudsmen (30 September 2013). "Let the boys decide for themselves". crin.org. Archived from the original on 19 February 2014. Retrieved 27 October 2013.
  5. ^ Lise Marit Kalstad (2 October 2013). "Vil la gutter bestemme omskjæring selv". Vårt Land (in Norwegian). Archived from the original on 4 October 2013.