Talk:January 31 – February 2, 2023 North American ice storm

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas / History Start‑class

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history.

Weather Start‑class

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Rename?

This winter storm has now impacted late January and early February. I can't think of a good title name, Late January-Early February 2023 winter storm isn't suitable IMO. Does anyone have any ideas on a better name to rename since this storm has now impacted early February? Tails Wx 17:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When it gets to that long of a name, I think the dates are used, similar to January 31 – February 3, 2021 nor'easter. Elijahandskip (talk) 18:41, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with what @Elijahandskip said. Let's rename this article based on the dates, like the aforementioned article (January 31 – February 3, 2021 nor'easter) , since the "Late January-Early February 2023 winter storm" name is too long. Cyclonetracker7586 (talk) 19:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. What about rename it when the winter storm event ends? The conditions may persist into Thursday. Tails Wx 19:26, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tails Wx I can also agree with what you said, we should rename it towards the end of the event because it would be kind of repetitive to keep moving the article every day, but then again that would mean we will have to continue using the current title until the event ends, right? Cyclonetracker7586 (talk) 19:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclonetracker7586, yes. Tails Wx 19:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tails Wx I don't know what to decide ~~because~~. I'll just let you, Elijahandskip, and other users decide. I'll go with whatever you guys decide, I'll continue uploading satellite images of the weather event on Wikimedia Commons until it concludes. Cheers guys :) . Cyclonetracker7586 (talk) 19:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'm kind of disputed on the article name because we're in February right now, so I'll talk to others about this matter. Thanks for your input! :) Tails Wx 19:49, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NCEI deaths

I highly disagree with it for 4 reasons

We’ve never done that split for death tolls.
NCEI won’t mark car crash death tolls.
NCEI isn’t always fully inclusive as can be seen with other storms.
All other media report many deaths, disagreeing with NCEI and signaling an error.47.19.209.230 (talk) 19:01, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Elijahandskip: Please address this concern.144.121.66.230 (talk) 16:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NOAA has the official and latest information. That is how death tolls get tracked and changed. Whether you like it or not, NOAA’s official information says 0 deaths from the storm system. Officially speaking, the 10 TWC deaths were decided to have been non-weather related deaths. Also, what is your source on “NCEI won’t mark car crash death tolls.” Because that is highly WP:OR. Elijahandskip (talk) 16:24, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The November 2022 lake effect snowstorm also had no deaths. NCEI’s storm events database is really not reliable outside tornadoes, because it forces the event to be a direct storm incident. Car crashes are due to ice on the road, and NCEI would only mark a car crash if it was like a tree falling on the road. Also, Elijahandskip, WP:OR only applies to article content. And considering even NYT reports ten deaths, we can discredit the zero, unless we want to do this for every winter storm. 69.118.237.29 (talk) 21:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]