Talk:Osmometer

Chemistry Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

I propose merging Clifton nanolitre osmometer into Osmometer. The Clifton page is unsourced, and reads like an add, but also contains information and details the Osomometer page could benefit from having, as such I think merging relevant content from there would beneficial. After which the Clifton page could be blanked and deleted. Additionally, some information might be suited to be merged to the linked pages on the Osomometer page.--Tautomers_{(T C)} 05:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Freezing point depression osmometer would be a more specific target for the Clifton page, and hence the better target for the merge. Klbrain (talk) 12:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 16:12, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy of various types of osmometers

The statement that freezing-point methods are most accurate is not supported by the reference. That reference refers to another report for that claim. That secondary references does not actually compare different osmometer types at all. It simply compares two dilutions of samples on a single freezing-point type machine. 137.53.241.15 (talk) 22:18, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]