Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomás Giovanetti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Alexandermcnabb (talk | contribs) at 15:44, 26 June 2023 (→‎Tomás Giovanetti: Closed as Move to Draft (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to Draft‎. Bit of a mess, originator moved back to draftspace but no other votes/contributions so can close (I think). Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:44, 26 June 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure) Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:44, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tomás Giovanetti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Argentinian young entrepreneur fails WP:GNG, undersourced declined submission as draft, pushed into mainspace by author. Interviews, incidental mentions, non-RS & none with a BEFORE. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:23, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alexander. Please let me know how to make this right. I'm just translating an existing Wikipedia article in spanish version to it's english version: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomás_Giovanetti
Please, I need help to acomplish it. I have made the above request to complete the article with real in-line citations (as well as its Spanish version) but it keeps being declined. Could you tell me what I should do to be able to publish it at last? Lucasvalpreda (talk) 12:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Lucas, you'd have been better leaving it in draftspace and developing it there for a start! You need reliable sources (compliant with WP:RS) that contribute to passing the test of WP:GNG, the general notability guideline. I'd read up on those two guidelines for a start - the subject of an article is suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. That's the issue here - right now he's not notable per WP:GNG which is why people were declining the article submission. And a search online didn't show any evidence of notability I could immediately see. In that case, the article would be deleted based on consensus from editors here. If you want to return it to draftspace, that can be done - but if so, next time I'd go through the submission route. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.