Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristin Hedger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kristin Hedger[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article states that Kristin Hedger is a candidate for office and a businesswoman. Hedger would not qualify under WP:POLITICIAN. Only under certain circumstances would a candidate qualify for an article based on their candidacy either as their candidacy has some sort of notability to it (e.g. Lar Daly for his use of the "equal time rule") or are candidates who qualify for reasons independent of their candidacy (e.g. Joe Exotic). Hedger as the "youngest to be a statewide candidate for public office anywhere in the United States during the 2006 election cycle," does not reach the level of Daly and her business career does not meet GNG let alone the level of a Joe Exotic, Cynthia Nixon, or another GNG qualifying person who happened to also be a candidate for office. This will be added to deletion streams for politics, North Dakota, and business among others. Mpen320 (talk) 03:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mpen320 (talk) 03:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions. Mpen320 (talk) 03:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Mpen320 (talk) 03:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Mpen320 (talk) 03:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Young person ran for office, lost and got job." Just a regular working person at this point, I don't see any further coverage for her. Oaktree b (talk) 15:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is about all the coverage I can find, could likely be her, but nothing for notability [1]. Still a !delete. Oaktree b (talk) 15:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Can't find any sources that pass WP:GNG in article or on Google. Having never been elected to office, does not pass WP:NPOL. There is no election article to redirect to. –Novem Linguae (talk) 23:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Maliner (talk) 09:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails GNG and NPOL, there's only really two sources in the stub (disregarding the image referenced?) and one is only a passing mention. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 00:10, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable political candidate. SportingFlyer T·C 09:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Consensus seems clear, but lending further support to an argument for deletion on the grounds discussed above. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 01:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.