Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raimo Olavi Toivonen

Raimo Olavi Toivonen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There seems to be a lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Most of the sources in the article are from the subject of the article and the article was almost entirely written by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/R.o.t (note the initials).

Searching JSTOR for "Raimo Olavi Toivonen" yields 0 results, searching for "Raimo Toivonen" yields 1 result. The one main space article that links to this is Aatto Sonninen which was written by the same blocked sockpuppeting account. Searching Google Scholar does find some papers and references to their papers, but it doesn't seem significant compared to any random researcher. Also see User_talk:R.o.t/Archives/2020/November. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - subject seems to think that Wikipedia is a free webhosting service. Skyerise (talk) 10:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:16, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - seems to have abused self-published sources WP:BLPSPS Dotdashmeredith (talk) 06:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - contains a link to an illegal Internet Archive copy of the Intelligent Speech Analyser site. (I am Raimo Olavi Toivonen copyrights owner of Intelligent Speech Analyser site) 2001:999:588:51DD:3534:D43E:2EFA:659B (talk) 05:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving is not illegal, because no one profits from it. In fact, it costs money to maintain. Archive.org also provides methods for removing pages and blocking crawlers, which you apparently have chosen not to use. This is not Wikipedia's problem and is not a valid deletion reason. Skyerise (talk) 10:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Skyerise, you obviously don't know copyright laws in different countries of the world. 2001:999:588:51DD:5970:C3EE:8554:2EA7 (talk) 12:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yawn. I do know that copyright complaints should be addressed to the violating party or to the courts. Not to Wikipedia. Skyerise (talk) 12:30, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From 1996 to 2023, the ISA website has had all bot blocks, but despite that, a few days ago the entire ISA website was copied bit by bit to the Internet Archive. I am now in negotiations to remove all copies of the 1996-2023 ISA site from 1996-2023 and to ensure that the Internet Archive does not copy from my ISA site. The Internet Archive already has several gigabytes of material under my copyright from 1996-2023. If for some reason the removal and blocking is not successful, the Finnish government will block the aforementioned robots from accessing .fi addresses. 2001:999:588:51DD:5970:C3EE:8554:2EA7 (talk) 12:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]