Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vermont Street, San Francisco

This article really stretches the notion of "notability". Why not have an article for every damn street in the city while we're at it? ILike2BeAnonymous 02:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I wonder how many Frisco streets have those Lombard-esque curves? I agree that Vermont Street doesn't merit its own article, but if there are only a couple of those types of streets, then a mention of Vermont Street in the Lombard Street article, might be in order, thus making a merge more appropriate than a straight delete. Mwelch 02:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note on comment: It already is mentioned in the Lombard Street article. I'm saying this street doesn't merit its own article. +ILike2BeAnonymous 04:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, although not as famous as Lombard, Vermont has long been considered "crookeder" than Lombard or at least a rival for the "crookedest street in the world" moniker. It might be an analogue to indie cred, but I think the article is notable when there are [100+ Google Books results] and media mentions of Vermont as a destination in its own right. -- Dhartung | Talk 03:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete I'm sick of those fags in San Fransisco and their shit. --Evergreens78 03:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so we'll take that as a "strong ignore" (of you and your point of view, that is). Next! +ILike2BeAnonymous 04:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Lombard street ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 05:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep After looking at the article I think this is notable. I remember when I went to San Fransisco I saw this street and I was like "OMG these liberals aren't straight, and they can't build straight streets either." --Evergreens78 05:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think the street I saw was actually Lombard, but whatever. --Evergreens78 05:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]