Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keir Giles
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Keir Giles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't reach notability. Only claimed to have reach notability recently because of authoring a controversial article on a current event. MicrobiologyMarcus (talk) 13:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Journalism. MicrobiologyMarcus (talk) 13:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- This article has been present since 2014, indicating that Giles was notable even before the controversial article. 2603:7000:8000:FD9F:2576:AB52:137:2361 (talk) 13:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- The longevity of the article doesn’t mean anything though? We don’t have a rule that if it’s been here for a long time it’s notable. If anything it increases the risk of citogenesis. NM 18:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- The article says that he is a director of research at a major defence firm, he's a public figure, and that he publishes articles in some very popular newspapers. Explain how he doesn't meet the notability guidelines? The History Wizard of Cambridge (talk) 04:57, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Easy-peasy BLP1E. NM 17:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)