User talk:Morrocan

April 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Western Sahara. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 23:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me that you're not going to try to remove references to Morocco's illegal military occupation of Western Sahara. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:12, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to remove reliable and valid sources. This Western Sahara page needs to be neutral and that means analyzing carefully and critically what it is written. Biases statement should not be accepted because there is a dispute on this territory. MYD (talk) 21:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, and we are both in agreement that reliable and valid sources explicitly state that Morocco is occupying foreign land in Western Sahara, correct? This was the finding of the International Court of Justice, what the UN has declared, multiple academics and non-profits, etc. We're on the same page here that you're not going to remove these factual statements, right? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:23, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It concerns me that you haven't answered the above post, but you have made this edit. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to give you my personal opinion on this conflict like you just did by removing my edit which was a valid edit. if you can't be neutral, how are you going to expect others to be as well ? Western Sahara is a non-self-governing territory like the other 16 territories in the world. MYD (talk) 17:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not asking for your personal opinion. I am asking you to agree to facts. It is a fact that Western Sahara is under military occupation from a foreign invader, correct? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Western Sahara is a disputed territory, Morocco is claiming to be part of his territory while the Polisario, an armed group/movement is seeking total independence. Western Sahara has never been a sovereign state or a country to be invaded. Morocco got control of W.Sahara through Madrid Accords where Spain gave up the administration of the territory to Morocco. This territory didn't go through the normal decolonization process that was set by the UN. the only people who will decide if it's "invasion" or "military occupied" or "Moroccan" are the people of Western Sahara. NOT you, NOT me, and definitely NOT some people on the internet. Hope this gives you the answer. MYD (talk) 18:10, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that Morocco illegally occupies Western Sahara is backed by a multitude of RS, making your opinion irrelevant. M.Bitton (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again you are not being reasonable. Give me one valid source from the UN that says "Western Sahara is the last colony in Africa" ? this is a heavy statement coming from a biased judgment. MYD (talk) 18:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Western Sahara. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 18:14, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are removing reliable and valid edits and replacing it with biased statement, this is unacceptable. This Western Sahara page needs to be neutral and that means analyzing carefully and critically what it is written. MYD (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For a start, you need to refrain from edit warring. Neutrality doesn't mean whitewashing. M.Bitton (talk) 18:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]