Jump to content

Talk:Spectroradiometry for Earth and planetary remote sensing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ngeo21*gnik (talk | contribs) at 17:32, 16 November 2023 (→Feedback from Tony). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconGeology C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconTalk:Spectroradiometry for Earth and planetary remote sensing is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSpaceflight C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peer feedback from Calvin

Hi Morris,


Great wiki page with rich contents! Here are some comments:

  1. Love the animation showing how monochromator splits light into different wavelength. But some figures can be larger for better viewing the content of it, for example, the figure illustrating the differences between multi- and hyperspectral imaging.
  2. Good use of table to summarize the content. May also consider to use table to organize the specification of different types of mineral on Mars.
  3. Consider moving the section of mineral identification to application instead of working principles.


Good luck!


Cheers,

Calvin Calvinw72 (talk) 17:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Maybe you can summarize the paragraphs containing lots of number into table for better comparison purpose (e.g. Different clay minerals and iron oxides in the Geomorphology and surface mapping section)
  2. For the Spectroradiometers part, it will be better to show some images of the actual components or the whole device.
  3. It would be better to reduce some words in the introduction part to help the readers having a better overview of the whole page.
Calvinw72 (talk) 17:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Louis

  1. Maybe you can make use of sub-heading in the Resolution of Spectroradiometers to improve readability.
  2. Add a application heading before talking about the applications, instead of using "The following sections will delve into the applications of spectroradiometry in various perspectives of geosciences."
  3. Perhaps mention about the fundamental physics behind the spectroradiometers to improve the overall understanding.

Louiskmn (talk) 18:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Add some graphics (e.g. reflectance spectrum of different minerals) may help improve understanding.
  2. For the table, I think you may want to reference every number in the resolution column.
  3. The page looks professional, good effort!

Louiskmn (talk) 14:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Jasmine

1. Have spectroradiometry in a title font right at the start of the page just to make completely clear to the audience what they are reading about.

2. Could make the first sentence more specific to the topic, rather than saying it has broad applications, make it a snappy sentence that summarises what spectroradiometry is in the most fundamental sense, then continue with the rest of the paragraph and going into detail.

3. In the resolution paragraph, maybe bullet point the resolution types so that they stand out to the reader.

Great page!

Jasmineforshaw (talk) 15:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. Could add in some diagrams of the absorption lines/features relating to the minerals. They are well described in text but it would be good to have a visual aid and good for visual comparison of mineral absorption features.

Jasmineforshaw (talk) 14:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Tony

1. A diagram showing the components of fore optics can better visualize its composition.

2. Sub-titles of the resolutions can be added on top of the descriptions of each resolution.

3. Good to use tables to show the practical usage of spectrometer in real life.

4. For “Mineral Identification” section, would it be possible to add a table showing the reflective wavelength of some common minerals?

5. A little typo in “Geochrology” section: “sediments [26][27]> Volcanic…..”

2nd Feedback

1. It could be better if you indicate the portions of wavelengths in the visualization.

2. Minor typo: “Mineral Identification”: Therefore, minimize such interference…. & “Geomorphology and surface mapping”: Chemical Weathering is one…..

3. You can give separate subtitles for Tephrochronology and Surface Dating.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Spectroradiometry_for_Earth_and_planetary_remote_sensing&oldid=1185425299"