User talk:Tazerenix
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Complex geometry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Serre, Sheaves and Mirror symmetry
- Yang–Mills equations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Critical point and Connection
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deformed Hermitian-Yang-Mills equation
[edit]Hi Tazaernix, thank you for creating many math articles on Wikipedia including Deformed Hermitian Yang–Mills equation. I would like to inform your that the solution to the deformed Hermitian-Yang-Mills equation has been posted on [1] recently. 71.82.237.65 (talk) 14:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deformed HYM
[edit]Hi, I'm not sure that your article on dHYM satisfies the notability requirements for wikipedia. None of the references are widely cited in the mathematical literature (according to mathscinet). However, it looks like the physics references are notable within the physics literature (according to inspirehep.net). If possible, perhaps you could rewrite the article to focus on those references? Otherwise, I think you'd have to add some references that show notability as a mathematical subject
Gumshoe2 (talk) 17:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. The subject is fairly young mathematically (the first real paper on the topic is from 2015 by Jacob–Yau) but it is closely related to some big problems in string theory (as you mentioned), special Lagrangians (highly popular), and Bridgeland stability (highly popular and also quite new, but a bit older around ~2005-2010). I would caution by saying that dHYM is likely to become a major theme of investigation over the next few years in gauge theory/differential geometry, although of course this is not exactly an argument for the notability of the topic at this point in time. I will give the article a do over to try and emphasize its notability with respect to these other topics. If it is decided it is still not yet notable enough for its own page I can merge it into Hermitian Yang–Mills equations or Bridgeland stability condition at a later date. Thanks for your interest! Tazerenix (talk) 18:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with everything you said, but of course one could make exactly the analogous argument for a very large amount of current research topics in math. It doesn't seem to me that dhym is distinguished among these. It'd be really wonderful if there were a wikipedia-like resource for articles on such things, exactly like your article, but as I understand it, wikipedia itself isn't meant for that purpose.
- (In my personal opinion, the three topics in current geometric analysis warranting articles are things immediately related to Chen-Donaldson-Sun, Marques-Neves, or Lott-Villani-Sturm) Gumshoe2 (talk) 18:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- As it happens I am planning to go over some of the CDS pages in the near future (cscK metric, extremal Kahler metric, maybe a dedicated page for CDS, which is currently in the K-stability page).Tazerenix (talk) 18:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sounds excellent... at one point I almost made an article for extremal metrics, based on Calabi's article, but I didn't know enough about notable developments in the time since that paper to make it satisfactory. I think an article on YTD would be really nice, especially since there is an article specifically for the Calabi conjecture. If you happen to be familiar with Tian-Yau, maybe you could also add a short paragraph to the Kähler–Einstein metric page for the noncompact case. (I don't even know if there is a "calabi conjecture" analogue in that case, and the page says nothing about it) Gumshoe2 (talk) 19:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for teaching me an interesting and important example of Several complex variables! SilverMatsu (talk) 08:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC) |
Your draft article, Draft:Stability (algebraic geometry)
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, Tazerenix. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stability".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:36, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for evaluating complex analysis. SilverMatsu (talk) 23:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC) |
Consultation
[edit]A few months ago, thank you for your advice on Complex projective varieties on Function of several complex variables. The part of the current historic section includes GAGA and the vanishing theorem, also, the current lead sentence of the Stein manifold starts with the topic of the Riemann surface, and I think that you will also be interested in the compact Riemann surface and meromorphic functions. I've also seen Chow's theorem in several complex variable textbooks. A excellent summary of current Projective varieties#Complex projective varieties seems to be a pretty good starting point (Can be used as it is) to mention it with several complex variables.thanks! --SilverMatsu (talk) 02:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 11
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Differential topology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hodge theorem and Finitely presented.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Differential geometry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conformal.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Nomination of Deformed Hermitian Yang–Mills equation for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deformed Hermitian Yang–Mills equation, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deformed Hermitian Yang–Mills equation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Mirror symmetry
[edit]I think there might be a small problem at the mirror symmetry (string theory) page, but you might be able to say more definitively one way or the other? [2] Gumshoe2 (talk) 09:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Tazerenix. Thank you for your work on Kähler identities. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Tazerenix. Thank you for your work on Kähler identities. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Software for images
[edit]Hi Tazerenix! Love the work you do here; it's good to see someone else who is active on the advanced math/physics side of Wikipedia. I mainly write in areas of quantum field theory/supersymmetry/string theory and I was wondering what software do you use to create your images? Inkscape? Just asking cause I should probably create some images of my own and I want to do it well. Best, OpenScience709 (talk) 17:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- @OpenScience709 I use mathcha.io which works well as a WYSIWYG image editor. It also exports to tikz if you are in the business of making images for papers. Tazerenix (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)