Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese threat theory
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chinese threat theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This could be a violation of WP:NOTESSAY and is worth a discussion. Amigao (talk) 03:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep no sufficient policy-based argument has been made. Buckshot06 (talk) 06:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Politics, Economics, and China. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Article could use some work, but the first few sources cited suggest this is a subject that has broad recognition and thus passes WP:GNG.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Extensive independent, significant coverage from leading media outlets, including Reuters, New York Times, Al Jazeera, The Times, The Times of India, as well as a plethora of primary academic work on the topic. Owen× ☎ 20:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It appears notable, doesn't look bad enough that deletion is the best option. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 00:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This seems to be a WikiEd article so pinging the prof: @Piotrus:. Also seems to be at least partially a translated article from zh. Jumpytoo Talk 05:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The article is not exclusively a WP:NOTESSAY violation to warrent an AfD