User talk:104.246.113.199

December 2021

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you made a change to an article, December 2015 North American storm complex, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:29, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

List of Possible F5/EF5 Discussions

Hello. This is just a little heads up that there is a large, ongoing discussion to clean-up the List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes section on possible F5/EF5 tornadoes. You previously had an interest tornado related articles, so I wanted to alert you to the discussions. You can participate or watch here. Elijahandskip (talk) 14:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

104.246.113.199 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The SPI did not do a good job proving this innocent IP is a sock. Just added a new one with a matching WHOIS. ChessEric (talk · contribs) 23:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC) Over 3 million people live on Long Island, so common WHOIS is to be expected. 104.246.113.199 (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The audacity of that last sentence is enough to deny this one. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

104.246.113.199 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yet again, evidence was rather meager. Literally all the evidence provided fell back on the previous block from March-June 2023. Admins seem to be really excited to block these Long Island IPs for no reason whatsoever. 104.246.113.199 (talk) 20:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Yet again, evidence was rather meager. Literally all the evidence provided fell back on the previous block from March-June 2023. Admins seem to be really excited to block these Long Island IPs for no reason whatsoever. [[Special:Contributions/104.246.113.199|104.246.113.199]] ([[User talk:104.246.113.199#top|talk]]) 20:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Yet again, evidence was rather meager. Literally all the evidence provided fell back on the previous block from March-June 2023. Admins seem to be really excited to block these Long Island IPs for no reason whatsoever. [[Special:Contributions/104.246.113.199|104.246.113.199]] ([[User talk:104.246.113.199#top|talk]]) 20:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Yet again, evidence was rather meager. Literally all the evidence provided fell back on the previous block from March-June 2023. Admins seem to be really excited to block these Long Island IPs for no reason whatsoever. [[Special:Contributions/104.246.113.199|104.246.113.199]] ([[User talk:104.246.113.199#top|talk]]) 20:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.