User talk:Dr Lisboa
Dr Lisboa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=the sole reason given for sock puppetry claims is reverting deletions of sections of the Jesus article. yet all those editors who repeatedly deleted the section have not been questioned or criticised. There is obvious religious bias from the Administrator that has blocked everybody that opposes the deletions. He has not blocked or even warned all of those people that repeatedly did the deleting of the section. Double standards are being applied based on religious bias |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=the sole reason given for sock puppetry claims is reverting deletions of sections of the Jesus article. yet all those editors who repeatedly deleted the section have not been questioned or criticised. There is obvious religious bias from the Administrator that has blocked everybody that opposes the deletions. He has not blocked or even warned all of those people that repeatedly did the deleting of the section. Double standards are being applied based on religious bias |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=the sole reason given for sock puppetry claims is reverting deletions of sections of the Jesus article. yet all those editors who repeatedly deleted the section have not been questioned or criticised. There is obvious religious bias from the Administrator that has blocked everybody that opposes the deletions. He has not blocked or even warned all of those people that repeatedly did the deleting of the section. Double standards are being applied based on religious bias |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}