Jump to content

User talk:Double sharp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nanahuatl (talk | contribs) at 05:55, 21 December 2023 (Vanadium: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Alkaline earth metals

Template:Alkaline earth metals has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Centaur (fairy chess piece) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 10 § Centaur (fairy chess piece) until a consensus is reached. Best, user:A smart kittenmeow 21:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Helium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Frankland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vanadium

Hi there. After a long break, I am back at chemistry articles :) Currently working on vanadium in Turkish. I was checking the data on the abundance of elements in Earth's crust article, and I found a source saying that the abundance of vanadium is 0.019% of the Earth's crust and that puts the element on the 18th place ("The potentiality of vanadium in medicinal applications", Dieter Rehder). But the article doesn't mention any source for that value. Do you think we should mention on that? Or should we ignore? Nanahuatl (talk) 02:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nanahuatl: WebElements agrees that vanadium is 18th, but not CRC. That said, I suspect uncertainties are large enough that one cannot really give an exact number. Double sharp (talk) 04:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is it a reliable source? Nanahuatl (talk) 04:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Nanahuatl: Well, it says that the data is averaged from eight reliable sources that differ widely from each other. So I think it's probably best to not give a figure, and instead say that V is pretty common and list a common element V is close in abundance to, like Cl. Double sharp (talk) 04:35, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And per "Thermophysical properties of vanadium at high temperature measured with an electrostatic levitation furnace", the density of solid vanadium is 5.7 g/cm3. Yet, the article says 6.11. Can you check that value too? Nanahuatl (talk) 05:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]