Jump to content

User talk:Wikitiful

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wikitiful (talk | contribs) at 23:15, 30 March 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Wikitiful (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not been of a sock puppet or vandal of Christina McHale. I only created this account since I had seen the wikipedia article before it was deleted and wanted it to be put under deletion review when I saw that it no longer exists. If you feel that I am a sock puppet you are completely wrong and I have not even made any edits to wikipedia, only put an article for deletion review. I know Christina McHale and I feel that the article does not have any valid reason to be deleted since it is not false information, is not one-sided, or does not violate any privacy because this information about her is already on the internet. Please unblock me because you are wrong and I have not even done anything wrong to wikipedia and you are saying that I am a sock puppet or a vandal. How can you even make a presumption that I am a sock puppet or a vandal when there is no established history, or anything but putting something under deletion review which is perfectly complying with the rules of wikipedia. Just because this is a shared computer, all other users are presumed to do something when it will not be done. No vandalism was even done either by deletion review. If any wikipedian feels an article should not be deleted, it can be put under deletion review; it is fine and I am presumed a vandal and blocked indefinitely for only that? This is totally unfair and I must be unblocked. I have not violated ANY rules of wikipedia!

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have not been of a sock puppet or vandal of Christina McHale. I only created this account since I had seen the wikipedia article before it was deleted and wanted it to be put under deletion review when I saw that it no longer exists. If you feel that I am a sock puppet you are completely wrong and I have not even made any edits to wikipedia, only put an article for deletion review. I know Christina McHale and I feel that the article does not have any valid reason to be deleted since it is not false information, is not one-sided, or does not violate any privacy because this information about her is already on the internet. Please unblock me because you are wrong and I have not even done anything wrong to wikipedia and you are saying that I am a sock puppet or a vandal. How can you even make a presumption that I am a sock puppet or a vandal when there is no established history, or anything but putting something under deletion review which is perfectly complying with the rules of wikipedia. Just because this is a shared computer, all other users are presumed to do something when it will not be done. No vandalism was even done either by deletion review. If any wikipedian feels an article should not be deleted, it can be put under deletion review; it is fine and I am presumed a vandal and blocked indefinitely for only that? This is totally unfair and I must be unblocked. I have not violated ANY rules of wikipedia! |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not been of a sock puppet or vandal of Christina McHale. I only created this account since I had seen the wikipedia article before it was deleted and wanted it to be put under deletion review when I saw that it no longer exists. If you feel that I am a sock puppet you are completely wrong and I have not even made any edits to wikipedia, only put an article for deletion review. I know Christina McHale and I feel that the article does not have any valid reason to be deleted since it is not false information, is not one-sided, or does not violate any privacy because this information about her is already on the internet. Please unblock me because you are wrong and I have not even done anything wrong to wikipedia and you are saying that I am a sock puppet or a vandal. How can you even make a presumption that I am a sock puppet or a vandal when there is no established history, or anything but putting something under deletion review which is perfectly complying with the rules of wikipedia. Just because this is a shared computer, all other users are presumed to do something when it will not be done. No vandalism was even done either by deletion review. If any wikipedian feels an article should not be deleted, it can be put under deletion review; it is fine and I am presumed a vandal and blocked indefinitely for only that? This is totally unfair and I must be unblocked. I have not violated ANY rules of wikipedia! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not been of a sock puppet or vandal of Christina McHale. I only created this account since I had seen the wikipedia article before it was deleted and wanted it to be put under deletion review when I saw that it no longer exists. If you feel that I am a sock puppet you are completely wrong and I have not even made any edits to wikipedia, only put an article for deletion review. I know Christina McHale and I feel that the article does not have any valid reason to be deleted since it is not false information, is not one-sided, or does not violate any privacy because this information about her is already on the internet. Please unblock me because you are wrong and I have not even done anything wrong to wikipedia and you are saying that I am a sock puppet or a vandal. How can you even make a presumption that I am a sock puppet or a vandal when there is no established history, or anything but putting something under deletion review which is perfectly complying with the rules of wikipedia. Just because this is a shared computer, all other users are presumed to do something when it will not be done. No vandalism was even done either by deletion review. If any wikipedian feels an article should not be deleted, it can be put under deletion review; it is fine and I am presumed a vandal and blocked indefinitely for only that? This is totally unfair and I must be unblocked. I have not violated ANY rules of wikipedia! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wikitiful&oldid=119154216"