This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 22:22, 14 January 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Archaeology}}, {{WikiProject Ancient Near East}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:22, 14 January 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Archaeology}}, {{WikiProject Ancient Near East}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Why are we capping Near Eastern Archaeology off at 612CE? I think there are plenty of good reasons to include post-612 periods in this definition. For example, professional journals dedicated to publishing Near Eastern research (e.g. Levant, Palestine Exploration Fund, Near Eastern Archaeology Magazine, etc.) do not discriminate. Any thoughts? If not, I will change in a few days. Bporter61523:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)bporter615[reply]
