User talk:Encoded

Home Send me a message Userboxes Desk Tools

Hi! Question regarding "Draft:SUN Mobility" article

Hi @Lewcm! Thank you so much for the helpful comments on the article sourcing. As you may see, I have removed sections that I had only heard of from the company's folks at their media round table and auto expo conversations in Delhi. Since some of that wasn't in the press yet (as pointed out by you), I have removed those sections of the article. It would be lovely if you could please review the article submission again please! Thank you so much, and wish you a lovely 2024! Eshshiv (talk) 04:57, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Eshshiv thanks for resolving the sourcing, the only concerns I have now is that some of the wording sounds promotional (like an advertisement), specific areas of concern are

Lead: that provides universal energy infrastructure and services to the transport sector enabling electric two-wheelers, three-wheelers and buses to be refuelled in a faster, cheaper, and more convenient way using battery swapping technology; thereby helping accelerate the mass adoption of electric vehicles globally, and transitioning to a sustainable, pollution-free future.

Offerings and Business Models: Enabled by a widespread battery swapping network of over 600 Swap Points across India, (I'd suggest maybe "SUN Mobility operates over 600 battery swapping points across India" or something similar instead? This text could also do with a reference). and users are assured of always receiving a fully charged battery pack that is constantly monitored for health and safety, in addition to regular and continuous upgrades to safety and range. (Keeping the monitoring, and upgrades will be fine, it just needs re-wording, maybe something like "Users are able to receive fully charged battery packs that SUN monitors for safety and range.")

Would it be possible to also reference SUN Mobility has over 60 patents..., a reference to the patent office's list would suffice here (sorry I'm not sure of which one it is or I'd add it myself)

I apologise for not mentioning this early and delaying the approval of the article. The article as a whole is good, and after the advertisement-sounding text is re-written I'd be happy to approve it :) Many thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 11:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks a ton for your helpful inputs ! I have made the changes accordingly, and have also removed the line on patents due to a lack of a single source from the patents office. According to the patents lead at the organization, the patents have been registered across several geographies, and hence do not show up on a common database yet.

I hope this suffices for an approval! :) Thanks again for all your help! Cheers! Eshshiv (talk) 10:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Eshshiv, I've approved the article :) I've just moved some bits around (nothing removed) to improve readability as well, you can see my changes here. Thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 21:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Lewcm! Hope you're having a lovely new year! After you approved the article, someone else decided to move it back into draft space citing a lack of enough sources :( I have reworked it and added a few more sources (almost exhaustively, this time!) and published the changes. But now, I seem to have inadvertently removed something that lets me submit the article for review again! Can you help me with this please? Or, it would be wonderful if you could review it yourself for approval of the article! I look forward to hearing from you, thanks in advance! :) Eshshiv (talk) 09:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Eshshiv, sorry to hear that the page got draftified. It is currently in mainspace, would you like it moving back to draftspace so it can be reviewed or it can be left in mainspace? Since my approval was reverted I'm going to leave it to other editors if you did want to move it back to draftspace. The new refs do looks good to me though :) Hope you're having a great new year too! Lewcm Talk to me! 09:57, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick response! I found a way to fix the error, and it's now back to being a proper article! If you're satisfied with the way it looks now, I'm happy to let it stay in the mainspace! Thank you so much, again! Cheers! Eshshiv (talk) 10:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

I personally think it's fine to stay in mainspace, my only minor concerns are sourcing for the paragraph Battery Swapping as a technology... which I've tagged in the article. I've also rewritten a small portion of the products and services section to hopefully prevent any issues with promo concerns. Thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 10:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from MD NOOR HOSSEN (MIRAJ) (08:40, 1 January 2024)

MD NOOR HOSSEN (MIRAJ) ধন্যবাদ। আপনাদের পরামর্শ পেয়ে আমি আনন্দিত। আমি এই সাইডে একেবারেই নতুন। আমার বর্তমান পেইজটা কতটুকু সম্পুর্ন হয়েছে বুঝতে পারছি না। কি করবো পরামর্শ দিবেন। --MD NOOR HOSSEN (MIRAJ) (talk) 08:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, may I ask which page it is you are referring to? If it's an article you're writing, please send me a link and I'll be happy to take a look, if it's your user page you're referring to you can add almost whatever you want. You can have a look at WP:USERPAGE to learn more about that :) Thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 11:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Baratang Miya (16:37, 2 January 2024)

Hi Mentor. I need to create a Wikipedia page about me. How do I go about it? --Baratang Miya (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Baratang Miya just to confirm are you talking about an article or a user page for yourself? I've included info about both.

Article

Creating an article about yourself would mean you'd have a conflict of interest (COI), so you'd need to read WP:COI and WP:ABOUTME. Your COI will need to be disclosed correctly, and I'd highly recommend creating your article through our WP:AFC process. Please note that you'll need to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for an article about you to be accepted.

User page

You can create a user page for yourself without any of the above issues, to do this click here. This page is shown when someone clicks on your name, but doesn't make an article about you if that's what you want. You can see my user page as an example.

Hope this helps, Lewcm Talk to me! 19:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Are there any volunteers who create wiki pages for people like me. I’m far reaching but it’s worth a try 197.155.20.212 (talk) 08:30, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

@Baratang Miya Yes, you can request this at Wikipedia:Requested articles Lewcm Talk to me! 08:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. 197.155.20.212 (talk) 08:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Draft: Multivista

Hi lewcm,

I hope that all is well!

I am referencing the Multivista draft (Draft:Multivista) as well as your Comment: "Please add additional sources to the "Products and Services" section, also consider replacing primary sources with secondary sources if possible."

I have added additional sources to the Products and Services section: is there anything you need from me to receive approval?

I am resubmitting now.

Thank you! Construction-Documentation (talk) 21:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Construction-Documentation thanks for adding the extra refs, unfortunately I'm unable to do a full review right now as I'm catching up on some work. If you'd like to resubmit for review, if another editor doesn't get to it before I do I'll take a look when I'm free. Thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 08:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Lewcm!

This article has been resubmitted for review. Construction-Documentation (talk) 03:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Bradley Tusk article

Hi Lewcm!

Basil with Bradley Tusk here. I had pinged you a while back on the Bradley Tusk Talk page but with all the end of year commotion, I wanted to make sure it did not slip by you unseen.

I had another suggestion to add some needed context to the Illinois subsection.

I will be happy to review any questions you have on the Talk Page! BasilAtTusk (talk) 19:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @BasilAtTusk thanks for reaching back out and my apologies for not responding, end of year celebrations and uni work are crazy as always and I must've missed it, sorry!

I'm a brit myself and honestly have no idea what any of the "filing" stuff means in US law contexts, so I don't think I'm the best person to review this. I've opened it as a request so another editor can sort it out for you.

Many thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 21:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello Lewcm！I tried to create the wikipedia entry: Yuewen (Chinese Literature) four times without success. Although I followed 'all four of these criteria' to find references to support the content of the article. Do you have any suggestions to help me create my wikipeidia article? Thanks a lot! JustinYuAu (talk) 04:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Articles for creation: Yuewen (China Literature Limited)

Hello Lewcm！

I tried to create the wikipedia entry: Yuewen (Chinese Literature) four times without success. Although I followed 'all four of these criteria' to find references to support the content of the article. Do you have any suggestions to help me create my wikipeidia article? Thanks a lot! JustinYuAu (talk) 04:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @JustinYuAu, when reviewing the article I noticed a few issues with references.

• Ref 5 & 7 are the same (you can re-use citations in the cite tool instead of re-creating the same one) and I believe fails WP:SIGCOV, that being said it should definitely be kept as it provides important context to the section of text it's referencing, but doesn't define notability.
• Ref 1 & 2 also fails WP:SIGCOV as it's more of an overview of the company and doesn't define notability.

If there's any more articles that do more of a deep-dive into the company's history or what they do, that would be a great addition.

Hope this helps, Lewcm Talk to me! 09:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Draft Review - ACR-PCR Method

Hello, an article I wrote was rejected for not have sufficient references. I added more references and added more citations. Can you take a look? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ACR-PCR_method Csensene (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Looks good, approved & moved to mainspace :) Thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 16:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

IEEE 693

Hello,

I wanted to discuss your review of the page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:IEEE_693

I see that you rejected it, and I'm definitely confused. It was rejected a couple days ago too with the same generic message (not enough info, not enough sources), so I had added multiple well-respected sources and much more details about the topic itself, but it still got rejected. I'm not sure if it's being rejected because of something that's wrong that i put in the article or for some other reason altogether... Vsriv90 (talk) 17:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Vsriv90 apologies for not adding a more in-depth comment to the AFC submission and thanks for reaching out.

The specific section that led me to decline the article is the "Contents" section as it is unsourced, if sources could be added here that would greatly improve the article.

Thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 20:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for reaching back so quickly.

I added that section directly from the norm.

The norms are usually sourced from the websites and engineering companies, and one has to pay for them. I have access to them from work, but giving a link to them directly might constitute an infringement of privacy.

I only added that section because the last reviewer said that the page might not have enough content. But truth be told, I'd rather delete the whole section than add more to it. Vsriv90 (talk) 21:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Ah makes sense. Do you mean the content is directly copied from the norm? If so, it'd need to be removed or rewritten per WP:COPYVIO. If not, I'm happy to help find references for it if you'd like, I think it is a good section to keep. Thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 21:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

I mean, any list of topics from any book has to be copied directly from the book, by definition :-)

But yes, please feel free to add for further references about it. I think it'll help seismic engineers of the future, and hopefully I and others can keep adding to the norm to make it more in-depth over time... Vsriv90 (talk) 07:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Yes sorry I meant if it’s like a direct copypaste of a summary section in the book for example, a list is fine :) I’ll have a look for references Lewcm Talk to me! 08:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! I think if you Google IEEE 693, you'll find tens of thousands of references from highly respected academic/manufacturer websites, but finding a reference to cite for the contents might still be hard; after all, the norms makes their money by keeping it away from the unpaid users on the internet... Vsriv90 (talk) 08:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! I think if you Google IEEE 693, you'll find tens of thousands of references from highly respected academic/manufacturer websites, but finding a reference to cite for the contents might still be hard; after all, the norms makes their money by keeping it away from the unpaid users on the internet... Vsriv90 (talk) 06:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I'm able to access the spec via my academic institution so I've been able to verify and cite it, you're able to cite restricted documents if you flag them as requiring a subscription/limited access. I've added a few citations that covers the areas that I was concerned with. Hope this helps, Lewcm Talk to me! 11:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Ah nice, didn't know that. Does that mean that the IEEE 693 page is now active, or do I need to resubmit it? Vsriv90 (talk) 12:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

It’ll need resubmitting. If you’d like you can ping me when it’s submitted and I’ll review again :) Thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 13:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Ping! Resubmitted :-) Vsriv90 (talk) 10:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Approved :) Lewcm Talk to me! 10:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Nice working with you! Go have a donut on me :-) Vsriv90 (talk) 11:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Rtrmobile (04:30, 7 January 2024)

How do I enter a new person’s bio --Rtrmobile (talk) 04:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, if you’re looking to create an article about a new person, please see WP:AFC, I’d also highly recommend reading WP:BLP first. Thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 09:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

2024 Memphis Tigers football team

Hi Lewcm,

I saw that you rejected the article I made (2024 Memphis Tigers football team), since there weren't enough sources. It is a article about a sports season that isn't happening until later this year, and many others have been made with little to no sources, just like mine. I hope that you can see why my article doesn't have many sources and accept it.

Thanks, TakiLakjsdf (talk) 23:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @TakiLakjsdf, when reviewing articles via we have to follow the AFC GNG guidelines which have tightened up over the years, as a reviewer I am supposed to only look at a draft on it's own merits and not compare to any existing articles. If there's any more secondary sources that could be added I'd happily accept the article. Unfortunately if existing articles came through AFC with little to no sources they'd also be declined, but I can't compare to them during the process. It might be too soon if there aren't more sources unfortunately. Thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 08:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Is there any good examples of secondary sources for my topic (I'm not asking for sources)? TakiLakjsdf (talk) 18:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, we accept a large range of sources as long as they’re reliable, independent of the subject, and have significant coverage of the topic. There’s more information on this page: WP:RS hope this helps, Lewcm Talk to me! 17:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Arash Habibi Lashkari

Thank you for your advice on the draft. What else would you recommend that could help the draft get approved?

210.247.208.106 (talk) 04:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I think the article looks good my concern was just with references which it looks like you've sorted :) Lewcm Talk to me! 22:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Cyclecar manufacturers

Hi, I notice you have proposed deletion of the articles on the cyclecar makes Baker & Dale, Bell and Broadway. As there are dozens of other equally sketchy articles in this list, I wonder if you are going to go on to remove all the brief articles that are linked to the list of UK cyclecar manufacturers, or if there is something special about the ones you have targeted. I should point out that I submitted an article on the Lington cyclecar recently and it has been turned down as insufficiently notable. I guess the same applies to the majority of articles in this list. RoachPeter (talk) 18:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, they're just ones that I saw that's why they're specifically prod'd. I have been thinking though, I'm going to remove the prods and start a discussion on merging the articles (I've done this in an AFD for a cyclecar), since individually I don't think they're notable via references/sigcov to have their own articles but they might be better together in one article. If you go into Cyclecar you'll see a lot have been deleted already, perhaps merging might avoid this. Lewcm Talk to me! 22:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I can see the attraction of merging all the makes, though I don't have the expertise to judge how feasible that is. It would be a pity to lose what little we have on these forgotten makes, but I can see that many of the individual articles are not up to present-day WP standards. RoachPeter (talk) 10:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Online bullying

Hi there, you kindly helped out with rectifying some libellous accusations that were on my biog page. Since then another fan has gone on and made it worse, 'quoting' material, but implying the same accusations. As these editors seem to insist on trying to undermine my work, should I suggest that this is taken to some sort of arbitration? Birkenhead01 (talk) 13:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I've had a look at the edits to the article and can see that it's now been removed by another editor.

You can request page protection at WP:RPP, this will mean that only experienced editors can change the page and can help cut back on the vandalism, this is usually the best route.

You can also contact the volunteer response team at info-en-o@wikimedia.org for more help/info, make sure to add a link to the article if you do email. I'll keep an eye on the page as well.

Hope this helps, Lewcm Talk to me! 14:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi there,

That was certainly removed from the lead paragraph. However, the editor has now re-published information that had been removed some months ago. And the mention of bullying- which was proved to be untrue - has been deliberately mentioned here in a sort of 'no smoke without fire' way. I think this is at least harassment, if not online bullying.

O'Connor's tenure as executive producer has generally been received as negative by viewers and former cast alike, primarily his decision to kill off sisters Ronnie and Roxy Mitchell in a swimming pool freak accident which elicited strong reactions from viewers and has been regarded as one of the "worst decisions in [soap opera] history". Barbara Windsor, who played the sister's on-screen aunt, described the decision to Hellomagazine as "a mistake." whilst former executive producer Dominic Treadwell-Collins also criticised the sisters' axing, adding that he was "really sad" to see them go. His decision to recast original character Michelle Fowler to actress Jenna Russell was criticised by viewers, who argued that the recast "just [wasn't] working". In June 2017, The Sun reported that O'Connor had been axed from EastEnders for bullying cast members as well as the soap's drop in ratings, however O'Connor denied this and The Sun were ordered to pay "substantial damages". Birkenhead01 (talk) 15:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Newbie2024 (00:01, 15 January 2024)

I looking at Bandsintown on Wikipedia and know from a recent article I read that the info is outdated. --Newbie2024 (talk) 00:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, if you think an article is out of date you're welcome to edit it to get it up-to-date. If you need any help with editing please read Help:Editing and feel free to send me another message :) Thanks, Lewcm Talk to me! 09:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello there,

I'd be wary about making any changes on a page about myself. But I see that the editor who was making this evarious accusations has been booked for having multiple identities and as making malicious comments on other pages, too. But I could just cut the lines which are problematic, without adding anything? Would that be acceptable? Birkenhead01 (talk) 12:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)