Talk:Eaux Claires

Festivals Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Festivals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Festivals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FestivalsWikipedia:WikiProject FestivalsTemplate:WikiProject FestivalsFestivals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United States C‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed the advert tag. As the person who's written most of the content, who has no direct affiliation with the festival, I'm pretty sure it was written in a factual manner with a lot of sourcing. Please point out what you think is inappropriate. There's a bit of flowery language, sure, but saying it needs to be rewritten by a non-'fan' is a pipe dream - who on earth is going to write a long-winded article about a random festival unless they're a 'fan'? Would it be best to look like a lot of festival pages which are simply a factual list of every band who played with zero context as to the festival itself? Wellado (talk) 04:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The entire issue with this page is that it's full of flowery language and is "a long-winded article about a random festival". This page needs to be trimmed down. Yes, to answer your question, it would be much stronger if it was focused on facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minnesotasteve (talk • contribs) 18:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]