Talk:2S4 Tyulpan

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Soviet Union Mid‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Smart projectiles

I read in some sites that in 1980 decade, former Soviet Union used projectiles of this mortar guided by Laser.Perhaps today projectiles guided by GPS are available for this mortar.Agre22 (talk) 04:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Russian do not use GPS only GLONASS Gnomsovet (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2S4 Tyulpan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mortar?

Isn't the defining characteristic of a Mortar (weapon) the fact that its muzzle-loaded and doesn't have a Breechloader? So why is the Tyulpan classified as a mortar when it is breech-loaded? Mztourist (talk) 08:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Yes, the "mortar" article states: "A mortar is usually (...) muzzle-loaded weapon". But it doesn´t have to be. The 2S4 ticks other boxes like "indirect fire only" and it has a light build, resulting in a low muzzle velocity, somewhat half of what contemporary artillery, like the M115, guns can develop. Alexpl (talk) 17:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So it should be classified as a Gun-mortar then. Mztourist (talk) 06:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, the procedure to set it up is lengthy, making it vunerable. So it is usually placed further back where it doesn´t have direct line-of-sight to it´s target, like the smaller calibre gun-mortars are supposed to have. Alexpl (talk) 12:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another answer is that the Russian sources on the 2S4 refer to it as a mortar. Btw, like their towed M-240 mortar, the 2S4 has a base-plate to absorb the massive recoil. So unlike e.g. the 2S9, the tracked chassis of the 2S4 is there to move the barrel and base-plate (and facilitate the breech loading), not to absorb the recoil. Lklundin (talk) 13:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recoil absorbtion is a good point. That could explain why, for ex, the german 21 cm GrW 69 was designated as a mortar while also beeing a breechloader like the 2S4. Alexpl (talk) 08:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]