Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilgın (given name) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ilgın (given name)

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated in May 2022 with no consensus and tagged for notability since June of the same year. This name has no WP:SIGCOV and no Wikipedia articles about people with the name, so therefore fails WP:NNAME. I can't seem to find any reliable sources establishing notability, either. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 09:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, namecruft which fails WP:NOTEVERYTHING. No people named Ilgın in Wikipedia today, although that could change. Geschichte (talk) 21:11, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Useful and referenced. Articles should be expanded and improved rather than deleted. There's no good reason to delete. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 01:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Referenced means nothing if the sources don't demonstrate notability, and useful is an arbitrary description. No good reason to delete? How about not meeting basic guidelines?! What if it can't be expanded or improved significantly? Everything you've parroted on all these discussions goes against WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Do you think anything is worthy of deletion? AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 03:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I apologize if I am short with some people. This is not a personal attack and I am assuming good faith. But still. It's like a copy-and-paste response on everything without bothering to look for sources or improvement. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. There is barely any coverage of this name and not a single Wikipedia article about a person with this first name. The lack of an entry for this Turkish first name on the Turkish Wikipedia is also a pretty good indication of this. Aintabli (talk) 05:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NNAME: "If at least two articles matching the surname or given name of the subject of a name article do not exist, then the surname or given name list article would not be notable and should not be created." All I can find is a fictional character in the Turkish TV series Tatlı Küçük Yalancılar and apparently the same character in a film, both played by Aslı Tandoğan. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.