Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Caldwell (government official)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Caldwell (government official)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing the sort of independent coverage required to meet WP:NPEOPLE, nor does this person's jobs meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:NPOL.

Of the third party sources used in the article:

This is a thinly rewritten press release and isn't independent
This is also a press release
This is easily the most significant coverage I can find, which isn't saying much, but per RSN I'm inclined to think Allgov isn't reliable Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 04:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Alabama, and Arkansas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - basically a CV. SportingFlyer T·C 18:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.