Talk:Tenebrae responsories

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Christian music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed because not a prominent example?

Francis, I regret that you have removed my edit "Motet by Franz Joseph Aumann; accompaniment by three trombones added by Bruckner in 1879" because "possible, but doesn't seem like a prominent example (compare Poulenc's: these are described in a separate article, linked higher on the page".

I find it not a good reason for removing an addition, which links to two other wiki pages (Franz Joseph Aumann and Anton Bruckner).

As written op Aumann's pagina, "Aumann's music was a large part of the repertoire at St. Florian in the 19th century, and Anton Bruckner availed himself of this resource for his studies of counterpoint. Bruckner focused a lot of his attention on Aumann's Christmas responsories and an Ave Maria in D major. Bruckner, who liked Aumann's coloured harmony, added in 1879 an accompaniment by three trombones to his "Ecce quomodo" and "Tenebrae"", with references of Bruckner's scholar Paul Hawkshaw and the Bruckner's Handbook. Moreover, it is cited in Bruckner's discography.

Please remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a document based on personal meanings or choices. I would thus suggest you to restore my edit.

--Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 09:12, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing personal. It didn't even have a reference. See also the WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE policy. --Francis Schonken (talk) 09:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Corinthians

"The readings of the third nocturn of Maundy Thursday are 1 Corinthians 2:17−22, 2:23−26, 2:27−34"

Is this a misprint? There are no verses by these numbers in the 2nd chapter of 1st Corinthians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:1514:54:C814:CAF2:C80F:4F06 (talk) 18:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scope and renaming

This page, started as a redirect to Responsory#Responsories for Holy Week, now opens with a very questionable definition and confusing discussion of "Holy Week". Historically as well as at present Holy Week has included Palm Sunday as well as Mon-Wed, and the 'days of Tenebrae' have their daytime offices. New Grove (under "Responsory") uses "Tenebrae responsories" in discussing the polyphonic genre, which seems the actual subject. Sparafucil (talk) 04:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]