This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 22:42, 31 January 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Redirect" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Sri Lanka}}, {{WikiProject Festivals}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:42, 31 January 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Redirect" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Sri Lanka}}, {{WikiProject Festivals}}.)
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Festivals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Festivals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FestivalsWikipedia:WikiProject FestivalsTemplate:WikiProject FestivalsFestivals articles
This redirect is written in Sri Lankan English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Eesan1969: My last edit summary didn't properly address the first of your two. You are correct that citations shouldn't be deleted without caution. I reviewed all that I deleted, and the writing did not seem to be journalistic in nature. I'd be happy to discuss specific instances if you like. —jameslucas▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄20:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Eesan1969: It’s frustrating that some newspapers publish proper journalism side-by-side with press releases, and even more frustrating that those newspapers are sometimes more widely read than more scrupulous newspapers. Fortunately, there are some quick and easy ways to detect fake journalism that work most of the time. Just now I picked at random one of the deleted references to double check: "ICTA's 'Disrupt Asia 2018' showcases advanced assistive technologies for persons with disabilities". Daily FT. September 4, 2018. Retrieved August 2, 2020. This is the first paragraph:
The 2018 edition of Disrupt Asia, Sri Lanka’s premier start-up conference and innovation festival, was successfully concluded recently at the Trace – Expert City with the participation of a large number of organisations and individuals connected to the growing startup industry in Sri Lanka.
Right away, the adjective ‘premiere’ and the adverb ‘successfully’ raised big red flags that I was reading promotional material, not journalism. The next thing I looked for was a byline, and there is none. The lack of an author’s name suggests either that no one was willing to stake their reputation on being associated with the content, or the author couldn’t be disclosed because she or he has a conflict of interest.