Jump to content

Talk:Public Transport Council

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 10:54, 3 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Removed edits

[edit]

Wikipedia articles should use reliable published sources. Wikipedia:Reliable sources explains this. Please cite your sources or rewrite from a neutral point of view. Thank you. —Sengkang 06:12, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PTC's replied in respond to a member of the public in the forum page of The Straits Time sometime in Sep 2006. If you are interested, go to look at the reply. - Icecold1 17:38, October 6, 2006

Since you are unable to re-edit it without reverting to your old edits, I have made copyedits with proper referencing. —Sengkang 17:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I find that my contribution is very neutral as I do not wish people to present statistic to their own advantage. Reader has a right to understand the limitation of statistic, and the intepretation of it. For example, why compare only with London, New York and Hong Kong? Why not KL, Manila or Jakarta? Did PTC take into consideration that the income of the people in New York, London, and HongKong may be higer than Singapore?

Furthermore, PTC justify the fare hike by citing bright economic outlook as a reason. If according to this logic, they should not approve the fare hike back in 2002 when the outlook is bleak.

Logic or not, wikipedia grows on sourced comments, not on personal views. I just demonstrated this by adding four comments, all of which were sourced, and that is the way to go as far as wikipolicies are concerned.--Huaiwei 07:14, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great job, Huaiwei. But I suspect Sengkang will come and edit your(our)comments in no time.

Don't grow white hair over this, I will leave it as it is now. —Sengkang 03:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]